Journal Information
Vol. 44. Issue 10.
Pages 578-579 (January 2008)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 44. Issue 10.
Pages 578-579 (January 2008)
Letters to the Editor
Full text access
Statistical Methods for Comparing Methods of Measurement
Visits
4018
José-Francisco Pascual-Lledó, Carmen Contreras Santos, Carlos Martín Carrasco
Unidad de Neumología, Hospital La Inmaculada, Huércal-Overa, Almería, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Full text is only aviable in PDF
References
[1]
AM Fortuna, T Feixas, P Casan.
Determinación de óxido nítrico en aire espirado (FENO) mediante un equipo portátil (NIOX-MINO® Aerocrine) en población sana.
Arch Bronconeumol, 43 (2007), pp. 176-179
[2]
S Pita Fernández, S Pertegás Díaz.
La fiabilidad de las mediciones clínicas: el análisis de concordancia para variables numéricas [accessed 01/07/2007].
[3]
J Lluís Carrasco, LL Jover.
Métodos estadísticos para evaluar la concordancia.
Med Clin (Barc), 122 (2004), pp. 28-34
[4]
DG Altman, JM Bland.
Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies.
The Statistician, 32 (1983), pp. 307-317
[5]
RR Luiz, AJL Costa, PL Kale, GL Werneck.
Assessment of agreement of a quantitative variable: a new graphical approach.
J Clin Epidemiol, 56 (2003), pp. 963-967
[6]
EM Wright, P Royston.
Calculating reference intervals for laboratory measurements.
Stat Methods Med Res, 8 (1999), pp. 93-112
Copyright © 2008. Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR)
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?