Journal Information
Vol. 42. Issue 7.
Pages 338-343 (July 2006)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 42. Issue 7.
Pages 338-343 (July 2006)
Original Articles
Full text access
Optimizing Exercise Performance With a Continuously Paced Shuttle Walk Test for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Visits
5158
Fernanda W. Rosa
Corresponding author
fwrosa@yahoo.com.br

Correspondence: Dr. Fernanda Warken Rosa. Rua Manoel Andrade, 201 - Ap 401. Cond. Pituba Ville. Pituba. Salvador. Brazil
, Aquiles Camelier, Anamaria Mayer, José R. Jardim
Pulmonary Division/Rehabilitation Center, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Background

A continuously paced shuttle walk test (SWTp) was developed to test the hypothesis that speed and rhythm could be more optimally imposed by an easier-to-follow sound stimulus at every step. The objective of this study was to assess the reproducibility of the SWTp and to compare the performance of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on the conventional and optimally paced forms of the test.

Patients and methods

The walk test results of 24 COPD patients were studied. All patients completed 2 SWTp sessions and a conventional SWT in random order, after an initial practice test for each. A portable device was used to measure peak oxygen uptake (VO2) in 6 patients.

Results

The intraclass correlation coefficient (Cronbach's α) was 0.95 for the STWp. The Pearson correlation coefficient between distance walked and peak VO2 in the SWTp was 0.86 (P<.02). Better performance was achieved during the SWTp (peak VO2, 3.30 mL/kg/min; P<.01; distance walked, 32 m, P<.001) than during the conventional SWT. The SWTp showed excellent reproducibility.

Conclusions

COPD patients can achieve better performance with the stimuli provided in the SWTp than in the conventional SWT.

Key words:
Pulmonary disease chronic
obstructive
Exercise test
Physical activity
Reproducibility
Rehabilitation
Objetivo

Se ha desarrollado una prueba de lanzadera por tramos (SWT, de shuttle walk test) con estimulación auditiva continua (SWTp, paced shuttle walk test) para comprobar la hipótesis de que es posible que los pacientes consigan una velocidad y un ritmo mejores mediante la aplicación de un estímulo sonoro, de seguimiento más fácil por ellos y correspondiente a cada paso que realizan en la prueba. El objetivo de este estudio ha sido evaluar la reproducibilidad de la SWTp y comparar el rendimiento de los pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC) en la SWT con estimulación sonora convencional y en la SWTp con estimulación sonora óptima.

Pacientes y métodos

Se han evaluado los resultados obtenidos por 24 pacientes con EPOC en la prueba de ejercicio de caminar. Todos los pacientes completaron 2 sesiones de SWTp y una sesión de SWT convencional, tras su distribución aleatoria a los grupos y después de efectuar una sesión inicial de práctica con cada una de las pruebas. Se utilizó un dispositivo portátil para determinar el consumo de oxígeno (VO2) máximo en 6 pacientes.

Resultados

El coeficiente de correlación intraclase (alfa de Cronbach) fue de 0,95 para la STWp. El coeficiente de correlación de Pearson entre la distancia recorrida en la prueba y el VO2 máximo respecto a la SWTp fue de 0,86 (p < 0,02). Se consiguió un rendimiento mejor durante la SWTp (VO2 máximo de 3,30 ml/kg/min, p < 0,01; distancia recorrida de 32 m, p < 0,001), en comparación con la SWT convencional. La SWTp se acompañó de una reproducibilidad excelente.

Conclusiones

Los pacientes con EPOC pueden alcanzar un rendimiento mayor con el estímulo auditivo proporcionado en la SWTp que con el correspondiente a la SWT.

Palabras clave:
Enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica
Prueba de esfuerzo
Actividad física
Reproducibilidad
Rehabilitación
Full text is only aviable in PDF
References
[1]
Gallagher CG.
Exercise limitation and clinical exercise testing in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Clin Chest Med, 15 (1994), pp. 305-326
[2]
Palange P, Carlone S, Forte S, Galassetti P, Serra P.
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the evaluation of patients with ventilatory vs circulatory causes of reduced exercise tolerance.
Chest, 105 (1994), pp. 1122-1126
[3]
Hernández TEM, Ruiz FO, Guerra JF, Marín JT, Riera HS, Rubio TM.
Comparación de un test de paseo de carga progressiva (shuttle walking test) com una prueba de esfuerzo en cicloergómetro en pacientes com EPOC.
Arch Bronconeumol, 33 (1997), pp. 498-502
[4]
McCarron RF, Ross J, Rippe JM.
Estimation of VO2max from a one mile track walk, gender, age, and body weight.
Med Sci Spor Exerc, 19 (1987), pp. 252-259
[5]
Cahalin LP, Mathier MA, Semigran MJ, Willian Dec G, Disalvo TG.
The six-minute walk test predicts peak oxygen uptake and survival in patients with advanced heart failure.
Chest, 110 (1996), pp. 325-332
[6]
Montes de Oca M, Balza MO, Lezama J, López JM.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: evaluation of exercise tolerance using three different exercise tests.
Arch Bronconeumol, 37 (2001), pp. 69
[7]
Singh SJ, Morgan MDL, Scott S, Walters D, Hardman AE.
Development of a shuttle walking test of disability in patients with chronic airways obstruction.
Thorax, 47 (1992), pp. 1019-1024
[8]
Hernández TEM, Ruiz FO, Guerra JF, Marín JT, Riera HS, Rubio TM.
Reproducibilidad de un test de paseo de carga progressiva (shuttle walking test) en pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica.
Arch Bronconeumol, 33 (1997), pp. 64-68
[9]
Onorati P, Antonucci R, Valli G, Berton E, de Marco F, Serra P, et al.
Non-invasive evaluation of gas exchange during a shuttle walking test vs a 6-min walking test to assess exercise tolerance in COPD patients.
Eur J Appl Physiol, 89 (2003), pp. 331-336
[10]
Bestall JC, Paul EA, Garrod R, Garnham R, Jones RW, Wedzicha AJ.
Longitudinal trends in exercise capacity and health status after pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD.
Respir Med, 97 (2003), pp. 173-180
[11]
Aalbers R, Ayres J, Backer V, Decramer M, Lier PA, Magyar P, et al.
Formoterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized, controlled, 3-month trial.
Eur Respir J, 19 (2002), pp. 936-943
[12]
Hernandez MT, Rubio TM, Ruiz FO, Riera HS, Gil RS, Gomez JC.
Results of a home-based training program for patients with COPD.
Chest, 118 (2000), pp. 106-114
[13]
Singh SJ, Morgan MDL, Hardman AE, Rowe C, Bardsley PA.
Comparison of oxygen uptake during a conventional treadmill test and the shuttle walking test in chronic airflow limitation.
Eur Respir J, 7 (1994), pp. 2016-2020
[14]
Keell SD, Chambers JS, Francis DP, Edwards DF, Stables RH.
Shuttle-walk test to assess chronic heart failure.
[15]
Morales FJ, Martinez A, Mendez M, Agarrado A, Ortega F, Fernadez-Guerra J, et al.
A shuttle walk test for assessment of functional capacity in chronic heart failure.
Am Heart J, 138 (1999), pp. 291-298
[16]
Ahmaidi SB, Varray AL, Savy-Pacaux AM, Prefaut CG.
Cardiorespiratory fitness evaluation by the shuttle test in asthmatic subjects during aerobic training.
Chest, 4 (1993), pp. 1135-1141
[17]
Bradley J, Howard J, Wallace E, Elborn S.
Validity of a modified shuttle test in adult cystic fibrosis.
Thorax, 54 (1999), pp. 437-439
[18]
Bradley J, Howard J, Wallace E, Elborn S.
Reliability, repeatability, and sensitivity of the modified shuttle test in adult cystic fibrosis.
Chest, 117 (2000), pp. 1666
[19]
Wedzicha JA, Bestall JC, Garrod R, Garnham R, Paul EA, Jones PW.
Randomized controlled trial of pulmonary rehabilitation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, stratified with the MRC dyspnoea scale.
Eur Respir J, 12 (1998), pp. 363-369
[20]
Singh SJ, Smith DL, Hyland ME, Morgan MDL.
A short outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programme: immediate and longer term effects on exercise performance and quality of life.
Respir Med, 92 (1998), pp. 1146-1154
[21]
Fabbri LM, Hurd SS.
Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD: 2003 update.
Eur Respir J, 22 (2003), pp. 1-26
[22]
American Thoracic Society.
Lung Function Testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies.
Am Rev Respir Dis,, 144 (1991), pp. 1202-1218
[23]
Kelsey JL, Whittemore AS, Evans AS, Thompson WD.
Methods in observational epidemiology, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, (1996),
[24]
Bland JM, Altman DG.
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.
Lancet, 1 (1986), pp. 307-310
[25]
Jardim JR, Camelier AA, Miki D.
The Latin American Perspective.
Pulmonary rehabilitation-Guidelines to success, 3rd ed.,
[26]
Tramontini MR, Mayer AF, Cardoso F, Jardim JR.
Variability in Walk Test Conditions at Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs in Latin America and on the Iberian Peninsula.
Arch Bronconeumologia, 41 (2005), pp. 667-678
[27]
Griffiths TL, Burr ML, Campbell IA, Lewis-Jenkins V, Mullins J, Shiels K, et al.
Results at 1 year of outpatient multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial.
Lancet, 355 (2000), pp. 362-368
[28]
Singh SJ, Jones PJ, Sewell L, Williams JE, Morgan MD.
What is the minimum clinically important difference in the incremental shuttle walking test (ISWT) observed in pulmonary rehabilitation?.
Eur Respir J, 20 (2002), pp. 67

This study was partially funded by CAPES, CNPq, and FAPESP, Brazil.

Copyright © 2006. Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR)
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?