Journal Information
Vol. 47. Issue 4.
Pages 190-194 (January 2011)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 47. Issue 4.
Pages 190-194 (January 2011)
Original Article
Full text access
Measurement of Fine Breathable Particles (PM2.5) as a Marker of Environmental Smoke in Catering Establishments in Zaragoza
Medición del nivel de partículas finas respirables (PM2.5) como marcador del humo ambiental del tabaco en locales de hostelería de Zaragoza
Visits
4276
Isabel Nerína,
Corresponding author
isabelne@unizar.es

Corresponding author.
, Carmen Alayetob, Rodrigo Córdobac, María José Lópezd, Manel Nebotd
a Unidad de Tabaquismo FMZ, Departamento de Medicina y Psiquiatría, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
b Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud Fuentes Norte, Zaragoza, Spain
c Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud Delicias Sur, Departamento de Medicina y Psiquiatría, Facultad de Medicina, Zaragoza, Spain
d Servei d’Avaluació i Mètodes d’Intervenció, Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona (ASPB), Barcelona, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Abstract
Objective

To estimate the levels of small breathable suspended particles (PM2.5) as atmospheric markers of environmental tobacco smoke in foodservice establishments in Zaragoza, Spain.

Material and method

A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted between October 2006 and April 2008 in various catering establishments in Zaragoza. A SidePack Aerosol Monitor (AM510 model) was used to sample and record the levels of breathable suspended particles (PM2.5) indoors and outdoors, and the following variables were collected: smoking policy (smoking allowed, completely banned, or partially banned with non-smoking sections, physically separated or not); percentage of smokers and presence of cigarette butts, ashtrays or smokers in non-smoking sections.

Results

A total of 111 establishments were sampled. The level of PM2.5 was eight times higher in smoking venues than in non-smoking ones and also higher than outdoors. The correlation between the level of particles and percentage of smokers was 0.61 (P<.01). In the non- smoking sections without physical separation the level of particles was twice as much as outdoors and similar to physically separated smokers sections.

Conclusion

Functional separations do not protect second-hand smoke. Only completely smoke-free areas are shown to lower this risk. The measurement of PM2.5 can be a simple method to assess the presence of environmental tobacco smoke.

Keywords:
Environmental tobacco smoke
Particulate matter (PM2.5)
Foodservice industry workers
Tobacco smoke contamination
Resumen
Objetivo

Evaluar la contaminación por humo ambiental de tabaco mediante la medición de PM2.5 en una muestra de locales de hostelería de la ciudad de Zaragoza, España.

Material y métodos

Estudio transversal observacional realizado entre octubre de 2006 y abril de 2008 en locales de hostelería de Zaragoza. Para las mediciones de partículas PM2.5 se empleó un monitor SidePack AerosolMonitor (modelo AM510). Se realizó una medición en el interior y otra en el exterior, y se recogieron las siguientes variables observacionales: señalización sobre la permisividad de fumar; división (física o funcional) entre áreas de fumadores y no fumadores; porcentaje de personas que fuman respecto al total; presencia de ceniceros, colillas o personas fumando en zonas y locales de no fumadores.

Resultados

Se incluyeron 111 locales. La concentración de partículas fue casi 8 veces mayor en los locales de fumador que en los de no fumadores y superior a la del exterior. La correlación encontrada entre concentración de partículas y porcentaje de fumadores fue de 0,61 (p < 0,01). La concentración de partículas en las zonas de no fumadores de los locales sin separación física (separación funcional) fue el doble que en el exterior y similar a la de las zonas de fumadores cuando hay separaciones físicas.

Conclusión

Las separaciones funcionales no protegen frente al humo de tabaco ambiental, sólo los lugares totalmente libres de humo son eficaces para disminuir este riesgo. La medición de PM2.5 puede ser un método sencillo para evaluar la existencia de humo ambiental de tabaco.

Palabras clave:
Humo ambiental de tabaco
Partículas PM2.5
Trabajadores de hostelería
Contaminación por humo de tabaco
Full text is only aviable in PDF
References
[1.]
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the Surgeon General. Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2006.
[2.]
B. Fríguls, O. García-Algar, C. Puig, C. Figueroa, J. Sunyer, O. Vall.
Exposición prenatal y posnatal al tabaco y síntomas respiratorios y alérgicos en los primeros años de vida.
Arch Bronconeumol, 45 (2009), pp. 585-590
[3.]
World Health Organization. International agency for research on cancer. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Volume 83. Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking.
[4.]
Ley 28/2005, de 26 de diciembre, de medidas sanitarias frente al tabaquismo y reguladora de la venta, el suministro, el consumo y la publicidad de los productos de tabaco. BOE n.° 309, de 27-12-2005; p. 42241–50
[5.]
C.A. Pope, R.T. Burnett, M.J. Thun, E.E. Calle, D. Krewski, K. Ito, et al.
Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution.
JAMA, 287 (2002), pp. 1132-1141
[6.]
J.M. Samet, F. Dominici, F.C. Curriero, I. Coursac, S.L. Zeger.
Fine particles air pollution and mortality in 20 US cities.
N Engl J Med, 343 (2000), pp. 1742-1749
[7.]
US Environmental Protection Agency, Fine Particles (PM 2.5) Designations [accessed 2010 Dec 10]. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/pmdesignations/.
[8.]
World Health Organization. Air Quality Guidelines. Global Update 2005. Particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide [accessed 2010 Dec 9]. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/air/activities/20050222_2.
[9.]
Travers MJ, Cummings KM, Hyland A, Repace JL, Pechacek TF, Caraballo R, et al. Indoor air quality in hospitality venues before and after the implementation of a clean indoor air law- Westewrn New York, 2003. Morbidity and mortality weekly report 53 (44), 1038–41 [accessed 2010 Dec 10]. Available from: http://tobaccofreeair.org/references.php.
[10.]
Edwards R, Hasseldholt CP, Hargreaves K, Probert C, Holford R, Hart J, et al. Levels of second hand smoke in pubs and bars by deprivation and food-serving status: a cross-sectional study from North West England. BMC Public Health [electronic publication] 2006;6:42 [accessed 2010 Dec 10]. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/6/42].
[11.]
J. Repace.
Respirable particles and carcinogens in the air of Delaware hospitality venues before and after a smoking ban.
J Occup Environ Med, 46 (2004), pp. 887-905
[12.]
Repace JL, Hyde JN, Brugge D. Air pollution in Boston bars before and after a smoking ban. BMC Public Health, [electronic publication] 2006;6: 266 [accessed 2010 Dec 10]. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/6/42/6/266.
[13.]
M. Mucalhy, D.S. Evans, S.K. Hammond, J.L. Repace, M. Byrne.
Secondhand smoke exposure and risk following the Irish smoking ban: an assessment of salivary cotinine concentrations in hotel workers and nicotine levels in bars.
Tob Control, 14 (2005), pp. 384-388
[14.]
Servicio de Estudios de la Caixa Anuario Económico de España 2009. Selección de indicadores. Caja de Ahorros y Pensiones de Barcelona. Barcelona, 2009 [accessed 2010 May 4]. Available from: http://www.laCaixa.es/estudios.
[15.]
L.J. Rosen, D. Zucker, H. Rosenberg, G. Connolly.
Secondhand Smoke in Israeli Bars. Pubs and Cafes.
IMAJ, 10 (2008), pp. 584-587
[16.]
G. Invernizzi, A. Ruprecht, R. Mazza, C.D. Marco, R. Boffi.
Transfer of particulate matter pollutions from smoking to non-smoking coaches: the explanation for the smoking ban on Italian trains.
Tobacco Control, 13 (2004), pp. 319-320
[17.]
A. Hyland, M.J. Travers, C. Dresler, C. Higbee, K.M. Cummings.
A 32-country comparison of tobacco smoke derived particle levels in indoor public places.
Tob Control, 17 (2008), pp. 159-165
[18.]
F. Sánchez-Martínez, M.J. López, M. Nebot, C. Ariza, Grupo de Evaluación de la Ley 28/2005.
Exposición al humo ambiental de tabaco en centros de trabajo antes de la entrada en vigor de la Ley 28/2005 de medidas sanitarias frente al tabaquismo.
Med Clin (Barc), 129 (2007), pp. 100-103
[19.]
L.J. Rosen, D.M. Zucker, B.J. Rosen, G.N. Connolly.
Second-hand smoke levels in Israeli bars, pubs and cafes before and after implementation of smoke-free legislation.
Eur J Public Health, (2010),
[20.]
D.G. Ellingsen, G. Fladseth, H.L. Daae, M. Gjølstad, K. Kjaerheim, M.P. Skogstad, et al.
Airborne exposure and biological monitoring of bar and restaurant workers before and after the introduction of a smoking ban.
J Environ Monit, 8 (2006), pp. 362-368
[21.]
I.L. Gee, A.F. Watson, J. Carrington, P.R. Edwards, M. Van Tongeren, P. McElduff, et al.
Second-hand smoke levels in UK pubs and bars: do the English Public Health White Paper proposals go far enough?.
J Public Health, 28 (2006), pp. 17-23
[22.]
P. Valente, F. Forastiere, A. Bacosi, G. Cattani, S. Di Carlo, M. Ferri, et al.
Exposure to fine and ultrafine particles from secondhand smoke in public places before and after the smoking ban, Italy 2005.
Tob Control, 16 (2007), pp. 312-317
[23.]
P. Goodman, M. Agnew, M. McCaffrey, G. Paul, L. Clancy.
Effects of the Irish smoking ban on respiratory health of bar workers and air quality in Dublin pubs.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 175 (2007), pp. 840-845
[24.]
C.I. Vardavas, B. Kondilis, M.J. Travers, E. Petsetaki, Y. Tountas, A.G. Kafatos.
Environmental tobacco smoke in hospitality venues in Greece.
BMC Public Health, 7 (2007), pp. 302
[25.]
M.E. Muggli, N.J. Lockhart, J.O. Ebbert, C.A. Jiménez-Ruiz, J.A. Riesco Miranda, R.D. Hurt.
Legislating tolerance: Spain's national public smoking law.
Tob Control, 19 (2010), pp. 24-30
[26.]
German Cancer Research Center (Publ.) The “Spanish Model” of Non-Smoker Protection in Hospitality Venues: A Failed Approach Heidelberg, 2008.
[27.]
Pleno del congreso 22/10/2010 de Admisión a trámite de la Proposición de Reforma de la Ley 28/2005. Cortes Generales. Diario de Sesiones del Congreso de los Diputados. Pleno y Diputación Permanente. 2010, IX legislatura, n.° 176, pp. 5–14 [accessed 2010 Jul 22]. Available from: http://www.cnpt.es/docu_pdf/pleno220610pdf.
[28.]
European Commission. Directorate General health and Consumers. Special Eurobarometer 332. Tobacco survey. May 2010.
[29.]
G.T. Fong, A. Hyland, R. Borland, D. Hammond, G. Hastings, A. MacNeill, et al.
Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the ITC-Ireland/UK Survey.
Tob Control, 15 (2006), pp. S51-S58
Copyright © 2011. Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?