Elsevier

Respiratory Medicine

Volume 136, March 2018, Pages 111-117
Respiratory Medicine

Identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and airway bacterial colonization by an electronic nose in bronchiectasis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2018.02.008Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Highlights

  • VOC breath-prints from colonized and non-colonized bronchiectasis patients are different.

  • Patients with colonization by P. aeruginosa and other potentially pathogenic microorganisms have different VOC profiles.

  • An e-nose can identify Pseudomonas aeruginosa and airway bacterial colonization in Bronchiectasis.

Abstract

Rationale

Airway colonization by Potentially Pathogenic Microorganisms (PPM) in bronchiectasis is associated with worse clinical outcomes. The electronic nose is a non-invasive technology capable of distinguishing volatile organic compounds (VOC) in exhaled breath. We aim to explore if an electronic nose can reliably discriminate airway bacterial colonization in patients with bronchiectasis.

Methods

Seventy-three clinically stable bronchiectasis patients were included. PPM presence was determined using sputum culture. Exhaled breath was collected in Tedlar bags and VOC breath-prints were detected by the electronic nose Cyranose 320®. Raw data was reduced to three factors with principal component analysis. Univariate ANOVA followed by post-hoc least significant difference test was performed with these factors. Patients were then classified using linear canonical discriminant analysis. Cross-validation accuracy values were defined by the percentage of correctly classified patients.

Results

Forty-one (56%) patients were colonized with PPM. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 27, 66%) and Haemophilus influenzae (n = 7, 17%) were the most common PPM. VOC breath-prints from colonized and non-colonized patients were significantly different (accuracy of 72%, AUROC 0.75, p < 0.001). VOC breath-prints from Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonized patients were significantly different from those of patients colonized with other PPM (accuracy of 89%, AUROC 0.97, p < 0.001) and non-colonized patients (accuracy 73%, AUROC 0.83, p = 0.007).

Conclusions

An electronic nose can accurately identify VOC breath-prints of clinically stable bronchiectasis patients with airway bacterial colonization, especially in those with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Keywords

Bronchiectasis
Electronic nose
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Volatile organic compounds

Cited by (0)