Asthma and lower airway diseaseEffectiveness of bronchial thermoplasty in patients with severe refractory asthma: Clinical and histopathologic correlations
Section snippets
Subjects
Fifteen adult patients (27-69 years of age) who met the American Thoracic Society criteria for severe refractory asthma (American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society criteria)16 were recruited at the Pneumology A Department of the Bichat University Hospital (Paris, France) between January and December 2013 (Table I). Selection criteria were patients with uncontrolled severe asthma, as assessed by an Asthma Control Test (ACT) score of 15 or less, despite optimal management and maximal
Clinical effects of BT
Clinical and airway functional parameters were examined before and 3 and 12 months after BT (Table I). Although 6 of the 15 BT-treated patients with severe asthma still experienced uncontrolled asthma at 3 months, we found overall significantly higher scores on the ACT and AQLQ (P < .001 for both comparisons) and a lower number of severe exacerbations (P < .001), visits to the emergency department (P < .001), hospitalization for asthma (P < .01), and ICU visits (P < .001) than those measured
Discussion
The present study was aimed at investigating the clinical benefit of BT in patients with severe refractory asthma and at determining which alterations in the different bronchial structures were associated with clinical improvement.
BT significantly improved asthma control, as assessed by daily symptoms (ACT; +52%), rate of severe exacerbations, hospitalizations for asthma, ICU stays, and emergency department visits. These effects were accompanied by a significant reduction in maintenance doses
References (36)
- et al.
Mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma (DREAM): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Lancet
(2012) - et al.
Distinguishing severe asthma phenotypes: role of age at onset and eosinophilic inflammation
J Allergy Clin Immunol
(2004) - et al.
Mechanisms of airway remodelling
Chest
(2013) - et al.
Measurement properties and interpretation of three shortened versions of the asthma control questionnaire
Respir Med
(2005) - et al.
Safety of BT in patients with severe refractory asthma. Research in Severe Asthma Trial Study Group
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
(2013) - et al.
A prospective feasibility study of BT in the human airway
Chest
(2005) - et al.
Specificity of basement membrane thickening in severe asthma
J Allergy Clin Immunol
(2007) Functional facets of the pulmonary neuroendocrine system
Lab Invest
(2006)- et al.
Purinergic signalling in the lung: important in asthma and COPD?
Curr Opin Pharmacol
(2004) - et al.
Severe refractory asthma: an update
Eur Respir Rev
(2013)
Monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of refractory asthma
Curr Opin Pulm Med
Asthma phenotypes: the evolution from clinical to molecular approaches
Nat Med
How variability in clinical phenotypes should guide research into disease mechanisms in asthma
Ann Am Thorac Soc
Noneosinophilic asthma in children: relation with airway remodelling
Eur Respir J
Lung damage and airway remodelling in severe asthma
Clin Exp Allergy
Asthma control during the year after BT
N Engl J Med
Safety and efficacy of BT in symptomatic, severe asthma
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
Effectiveness and safety of BT in the treatment of severe asthma: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
Cited by (161)
Exhaled breath analyses for bronchial thermoplasty in severe asthma patients
2024, Respiratory MedicineAirway wall extracellular matrix changes induced by bronchial thermoplasty in severe asthma
2024, Journal of Allergy and Clinical ImmunologyPatient profiling to predict response to bronchial thermoplasty in patients with severe asthma
2023, Respiratory InvestigationEosinophils and tissue remodeling: Relevance to airway disease
2023, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Supported in part by Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Mass.
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: M. Pretolani receives grant support from MedImmune. G. Thabut serves as a consultant for GlaxoSmithKline and AstraZeneca and travel support from AstraZeneca. P. Chanez received an honorarium and personal fees from Boston Scientific; serves on the board for Chiesi, Novartis, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, TEVA, Boston Scientific, ALK-Abelló, and Sanofi; receives grant support from Roche, AstraZeneca and Jannsen; and receives payments for lectures from Novartis, Boston Scientific, AstraZeneca, Chiesi, and ALK-Abelló. M. Aubier receives grant support from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, and Boston Scientific. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.
- ∗
These authors contributed equally to this work.