Original article
Hospital at home for acute respiratory patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2006.02.023Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

The issue of “hospital at home” (HAH) for acute respiratory patients is one that is still being debated, partly because economic, cultural and health service differences between locations imply that HAH schemes need to be tailored to local situations. The aim of the present study was to analyze the feasibility and effectiveness of HAH for patients with acute respiratory disease at our institution.

Methods

Of all the patients admitted to our institution via the emergency department during a 34-day subject enrollment period, 25 with diagnoses of respiratory infection, pneumonia, pulmonary insufficiency or exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who were living within 25 km of our center and who were willing to receive HAH care were assigned to HAH. Fifty sex-matched controls with the same diagnoses were given conventional hospital care (CHC) as inpatients. The dependent variables evaluated included time to discharge, readmissions within 3 months and deaths within 3 months.

Results

There were no significant differences between the HAH and CHC groups with regard to age, diagnoses, physical and analytical findings, or co-morbidity, or with regard to deaths (HAH 16%, CHC 10%) or readmissions (HAH 17%, CHC 24%). Time to final discharge was significantly shorter for HAH patients (7 days) than for CHC patients (12 days). Some 95% of the HAH patients were satisfied and would choose HAH again.

Conclusions

HAH seems feasible for appropriately selected acute respiratory disease patients presenting in our emergency department. It frees hospital beds for other patients, its readmission and mortality rates are no higher than for conventional hospitalization, and, in general, it is favorably evaluated by patients.

Introduction

Hospital inpatient costs account for a major part of total public health costs. Recent years have seen a marked trend towards shortening the time patients spend in the hospital, with the concomitant risk that morbidity and mortality rise due to the discharge of unstable patients [1], [2]. One way of countering this risk is to implement hospital at home (HAH) or supported discharge services, a practice that has become increasingly widespread since its initiation by Bluestone at the Montefiori Hospital in New York [3]. In this paper, “HAH” will refer exclusively to the practice of returning patients home, with support by hospital medical staff, immediately after evaluation, while “supported discharge” will refer to the discharge of patients, with home support by hospital medical staff, after an initial period as inpatients; both modalities are increasingly being employed [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9].

In spite of their growing popularity, the benefits that HAH and supported discharge are claimed to bring, both for the patient and the health system [4], [5], [8], [10], [11], [12], have been disputed on both economic and patient satisfaction grounds [13], [14]. In the study described here, we assessed the utility of a HAH scheme for acute respiratory patients in our institution; compared it with conventional admission to a hospital ward with regard to time to final discharge, readmissions and mortality within 3 months of discharge, and other parameters, and evaluated the satisfaction of patients assigned to HAH.

Section snippets

The HAH scheme and study

The HAH scheme evaluated works as follows. Patients admitted to hospital care in the emergency department (by physicians not involved in the HAH scheme) are then evaluated by HAH physicians to determine whether they fulfill not only the clinical criteria for HAH but also the residential and social criteria and the willingness criterion (willingness to be attended at home; see Appendix A). Patients who do not meet these criteria are dealt with as inpatients (conventional hospital care, CHC),

Results

Of the 28 patients admitted to the emergency department during the study period who fulfilled the criteria for admission to HAH (other than willingness) in this study, only 3 (11%) refused to be attended at home. However, it was not possible to obtain full data for the totality of either the HAH group or the control group. In particular, spirometric parameters were measured for only 14 HAH patients and for 25 in the CHC group. Of the other 11 patients in the HAH group, the habitual place of

Discussion

The desirability and viability of HAH or supported discharge schemes in a given context depend on the organization and funding of the relevant public health services and on the possibility of the need for family involvement being met, which in turn depends on social, economic and cultural factors. In this study, our first objective was to evaluate the utility of the HAH service we had designed and set up for the care of acute respiratory patients. In this regard, the 25 patients who satisfied

References (34)

  • J. Kosecoff et al.

    Prospective payment system and impairment at discharge. The ‘quicker-and-sicker’ story revisited

    JAMA

    (Oct 17 1990)
  • E.A. Halm et al.

    Instability on hospital discharge and the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with pneumonia

    Arch Intern Med

    (Jun 10 2002)
  • E.M. Bluestone

    The principles and practices of home care

    JAMA

    (1954)
  • M.M. Cotton et al.

    Early discharge for patients with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial

    Thorax

    (2000)
  • E. Sala et al.

    Supported discharge shortens hospital stay in patients hospitalized because of an exacerbation of COPD

    Eur Respir J

    (June 1 2001)
  • S.H. Richards et al.

    Randomised controlled trial comparing effectiveness and acceptability of an early discharge, hospital at home scheme with acute hospital care

    BMJ

    (1998)
  • D.S. Postma et al.

    Home treatment of COPD exacerbations

    Thorax

    (1999)
  • Cited by (17)

    • Outpatient Interventions for Managing Acute Complications of Chronic Diseases: A Scoping Review and Implications for Patients With CKD

      2020, American Journal of Kidney Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      Home visits were conducted by physicians in 9 interventions and by nurses in all, with involvement of allied health professionals on the care team in 4 programs. Almost half the interventions (n = 7)26,28,33,35,36,38,39 indicated that they were operational 7 days per week, most often during daytime hours, with 4 specifying after-hours nursing or physician telephone support.9-41 All provided standard medical therapies in the home for patients meeting eligibility criteria (eg, clinical stability, proximity to hospital, and access to telephone and home support), but only 4 described the provision of patient education as part of the program.26,27,29,35

    • Self-administered outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (S-OPAT) for infective endocarditis: A safe and effective model

      2015, European Journal of Internal Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most HIHs have a wide list of services for the patient including intravenous antibiotic treatment (OPAT) which, over recent years, has received considerable attention. Other clinical processes addressed by HIHs include pulmonary embolism, acute renal insufficiency, post-surgery processes as well as decompensation in chronic diseases including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and congestive heart failure [10–12]. The main difference between OPAT and HIH is that, in the latter, clinical follow-up by the healthcare professionals is very close.

    • Patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis and comorbidity can be treated at home

      2010, European Journal of Internal Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Hospital at Home is becoming an alternative to Conventional Hospitalization, because it allows treating patients with conditions requiring hospital admission at their own home. Several studies have shown the efficacy of home treatment of patients with acute diseases and acute exacerbations of chronic diseases [7–11]. The aim of our study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of treating patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis and comorbidity in Hospital at Home.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text